On the morning of May 28, China Eastern Airlines undertook the primary industrial flight of a narrow-body jetliner inbuilt China called the C919—a project built by COMAC (Industrial Aircraft Corporation of China) and long within the works. Aviation enthusiasts even bought tickets on Flight MU9191 prematurely, only for a shot at being onboard the historic two-hour flight from Shanghai’s Hongqiao International Airport to Beijing’s Capital International Airport.
Comac previously broke latest ground with its smaller ARJ-21 regional jet (similar class to the A220 or Embraer E190 series), which entered industrial service in 2016. But while China has long built military aircraft domestically, the marketplace for large industrial jetliners must satisfy more stringent safety and price efficiency requirements if industrial carriers are to buy them.
Nevertheless, due to the sway of shopping for domestically, the C919 already has over 1,000 domestic orders or options for orders, although it’s entering service seven years later than intended.
Production of the C919 is a crucial milestone for China, but still falls in need of the entire enchilada. While the airframe is inbuilt China, most of essentially the most complicated components—including the engines, in-flight avionics, sensors, landing gears, etc.—are still sourced from abroad.
Spies and Super Computers: Designing the C919
Like other sectors of Chinese industry, China’s aviation sector has historically relied on importing or license-building foreign designs (or more recently, acquiring schematics through hacking and/or espionage) and reverse-engineering them to eventually develop substitute domestic models tailored to Chinese characteristics. This approach has encountered limitations, nevertheless, relating to certain particularly complicated technologies—notably, high performance jet engines.
When first conceived in 2008, the C919 was projected to make its first flight by 2014 and enter service in 2018. Despite the usage of the Tianhe-2 super computer for digital modeling, the primary flight date was moved back three years to May 2017. Then, it was many more months before a second flight was performed resulting from problems with the elevators. By one estimate, funding from China’s government totaled between $49 billion and $72 billion in then-equivalent USD by 2020.
By 2018, western intelligence agencies began reporting that Turbine Panda, a hacking group related to China’s Ministry of State Security, was implicated in stealing specifications and technology to be used within the C919 from 13 Western corporations. And contractors like GE, Honeywell and Safran actually provided parts utilized in the C919. Along with trojan-based hacking, intelligence agents also sought to recruit inside sources in GE and the U.S. Army Reserves. 4 agents and recruits were arrested on U.S. soil, with one other six indicted in absentia.
In 2020, the C919 finally made a public overflight on the Zhuhai airshow, resulting in its first industrial flight in May.
C919 by the Numbers
The C919 is a single-aisle airliner (ie. only two lines of seats) built for medium-distance operations, with a capability for between 158 to 174 seats depending on how they’re configured. The design is, in some ways, rooted in Airbus’s similar A320 airliner, without in search of to match efficiencies achieved in its most up-to-date incarnation. For instance, wings made from lighter carbon-fiber composites needed to be substituted for aluminum.
The usual C919 is specced for operations out to over 2,200 miles, a distance few domestic flights exceed inside China. That said, an prolonged range variant is planned that would exit to three,450 miles.
Much of the airframe is indeed domestic, with parts produced from AVIC factories across China: the nose (Chengdu), tail control surfaces (Shenyang), parts of the wings (Xi’an), the flaps (Changhe) and the fuselage (Hongdu). Final assembly takes place in Shanghai.
But beyond that, nearly all the remaining C919 components come from overseas or from a partnership between a Chinese and foreign company.
Two CFM LEAP 1C high-bypass turbofan engines co-built by General Electric and French company Safran provide propulsion, generating as much as 15 tons of thrust and allowing for a cruising speed of 521 miles per hour. Earlier submodels of the LEAP 1 engines are also used on Airbus 320neo and Boeing 737 MAX series of aircraft.
Licensing export of LEAP engines caused controversy within the U.S., with hawks advocating for an export ban on the grounds that exporting the engine may very well be a risk to national security interests resulting from China’s historical predilection for reverse-engineering aircraft parts. But others argued that the engine wasn’t truly that militarily sensitive, and that a U.S. embargo would invite retaliation and cause massive losses to U.S. industrial aviation sales and flights in China.
In theory, a domestic engine called the CJ-1000A, built by AVIC, could eventually replace the LEAP turbofans. Under development since 2009, ground tests began on the engine in 2018, while a flight test mounted on a Y-20 ‘Chubby Girl’ transport plane reportedly took place in March of 2023. Certification and industrial use of the engine are usually not projected earlier than 2027 and 2030 respectively—on the earliest. The CJ-1000 is believed to be heavily informed by stolen data on the LEAP engine, which it’s appears to match in dimensions.
Other foreign components within the C919 include:
- landing gear from French company Liebherr Aerospace
- Michelin tires
- Auxiliar Power Units inbuilt a partnership between GE and China’s AVIC
- fly-by-wire controls system (which routinely translate pilot input to govern flaps, stabilizers and so forth) by Ohio-based Parker Aerospace and AVIC
- Communications, navigation systems by Collins Aerospace (U.S.)
- Brakes by Honeywell (U.S.)
National Champion Airliner
The C919 was originally projected to cost around $50 million per plane—a highly competitive rate. China Eastern Airlines later claimed, in 2022, that it paid $60-70 million per C919—still quite advantageous. By comparison, current models of Boeing’s narrow-body 737-700 and 800 MAX airliners which use LEAP-1 engines reportedly cost $100-135 million, depending on capability.
Nevertheless, other reports indicate the C919’s price roughly doubled to $99 million—a much smaller price advantage. Perhaps subsidies or other measures to artificially deflate the worth could explain the discrepancy. It’s also value keeping in mind that the C919 isn’t cheaper to operate per flight hour than the most recent 737s and A320, and resulting from smaller fuel tanks, it has a significantly shorter range than the A320’s 3,300+ miles.
Even an article in state-owned China Each day proclaiming the “benefits” of the C919 over its foreign rivals only finally ends up listing its “homefield advantage” in China’s growing air travel sector.
That said, in China, home-field advantage can carry one far. Already, Comac claims to have 1,200 C919s order from quite a few corporations, though only a small fraction are fully confirmed.
The largest preorders come from HNA Group (200 aircraft), followed by Chinese megabanks ICBC (100), Agricultural Bank of China (65), and China Construction Bank and Ping’an (50 each).
The C919 is clearly a “national champion” product, and if it performs closely enough to a 737 or A320, that could be enough given political pressure for domestic airlines to purchase the national plane.
U.S.-based engine supplier GE Capital also has placed an order for 10, probably for R&D purposes. There have been indications of interest abroad from Nigeria Air and Ryan Air. But major obstacles remain: slow production and an absence of certifications outside of China with the U.S.’s FAA or Europe’s EASA—though applications have been made.
In five years, Comac hopes to be constructing C919s at a rate of 150 per 12 months—comparable to just two months of A320 production. In accordance with one evaluation, the subsequent 20 years could credibly see production total 1,000-1,500 C919s—at most taking over 20-30% of China’s domestic aviation market, which is anticipated to rise to around 8,500 airliners and cargo jets by 2041. That leaves Boeing and Airbus loads of room to proceed their business in China.
China can be constructing a prototype of the CR929 wide-body jetliner with Russia’s United Aircraft Corporation, but this project’s viability might be adversely affected by Russia’s collapsing access to Western markets for sales and components, resulting from sanctions.
Predicting the Future
James Fallows, who wrote about China’s civil aviation sector in his 2012 book China Airborne, notes in a 2022 article that he accurately predicted a number of key things regarding the C919—that the plane would rely totally on domestic buy-in, would struggle to match Boeing and Airbus’s globally distributed sales, supply, maintenance and training infrastructure, and would proceed to depend upon components and avionics from Europe and North America.
The C919 doesn’t yet insulate China’s industrial air travel sector from dependence on foreign airliners and aircraft components. And its overseas buyers are prone to mostly be close allies with Western states or have limited access to Western markets—that’s, unless Comac truly can deliver aircraft on the cheaper $60-70 million price point.
Nonetheless, it’s a crucial step for China toward constructing an independent industrial aviation sector that might be carried aloft by Beijing’s ability to make sure domestic procurement of a fledgling national champion. There are a lot of bells and whistles to get right with a purpose to assemble secure and economically viable jetliners, and the difficulties of today are prerequisite for broader successes tomorrow.
Over time, more of the C919’s foreign-built insides will likely be regularly substituted by domestic systems once sufficiently matured. Perhaps that can sooner or later parallel the experience of other Western industries which have found their presence in China once indigenous rivals have been adequately nurtured. But for now, the C919’s insides point to industry domination being a great distance off.