Can machines sniff out the presence of life on other planets? Well, to some extent, they already are.
Sensors onboard spacecraft exploring other worlds have the aptitude to detect molecules indicative of alien life. Yet, organic molecules that hint at intriguing biological processes are known to degrade over time, making their presence difficult for current technology to identify.
But now, a newly developed method based on artificial intelligence (AI) is able to detecting subtle differences in molecular patterns that indicate biological signals — even in samples a whole bunch of tens of millions of years old. Higher yet, the mechanism offers results with 90% accuracy, in accordance with recent research.
In the longer term, this AI system may very well be embedded in smarter sensors on robotic space explorers, including landers and rovers on the moon and Mars, in addition to inside spacecraft circling potentially habitable worlds like Enceladus and Europa.
“We began with the concept the chemistry of life differs fundamentally from that of the inanimate world; that there are ‘chemical rules of life’ that influence the range and distribution of biomolecules,” Robert Hazen, a scientist on the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington D.C. and co-author of the brand new study, said in a statement. “If we could deduce those rules, we will use them to guide our efforts to model life’s origins or to detect subtle signs of life on other worlds.”
Related: NASA hopes humanoid robots will help us explore the moon and Mars
The brand new method relies on the premise that chemical processes that govern the formation and functioning of biomolecules differ fundamentally from those in abiotic molecules, in that biomolecules (like amino acids) hold on to information in regards to the chemical processes that made them. That is prone to hold true for alien life, too, in accordance with the brand new study.
On any world, life may produce and use higher quantities of a select few compounds to operate every day. This is able to differentiate them from abiotic systems — and it’s these differences that may be spotted and quantified with AI, the researchers said within the statement.
The team first trained the machine learning algorithm with 134 samples, of which 59 were biotic and 75 were abiotic. Next, to validate the algorithm, the info was randomly split right into a training set and a test set. The AI method successfully identified biotic samples from living things like shells, teeth, bones, rice, human hair in addition to from ancient life preserved in certain fossilized fragments manufactured from things like coal, oil and amber.
The tool also identified abiotic samples including chemicals like amino acids that were created in a lab in addition to carbon-rich meteorites, in accordance with the brand new study.
Almost immediately, the brand new AI method may be used to review the three.5 billion-year-old rocks within the Pilbara region in Western Australia, where the world’s oldest fossils are thought to exist. First present in 1993, these rocks were considered fossilized stays of microbes akin to cyanobacteria, which were the primary living organisms to provide oxygen on Earth.
If confirmed, the bacteria’s presence so early in Earth’s history would mean the planet was friendly towards thriving life much sooner than previously thought. Nonetheless, those findings have remained controversial, as research repeatedly identified that the evidence will also be resulting from pure geological processes having nothing to do with ancient life. Perhaps AI holds the reply.
This research is described in a paper published Monday (Sept. 25) within the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.