WASHINGTON — For the third consecutive 12 months, bipartisan laws shall be moving through the House and Senate aiming to ascertain a Space National Guard as a reserve component of the U.S. Space Force.
The legislative push, led by lawmakers from Colorado, California and Florida, has encountered stern opposition from the White House Office of Management and Budget which argues that a Space National Guard will introduce additional costs and unnecessary bureaucracy into the system.
A new edition of the Space National Guard bill introduced this month by House members from Colorado Jason Crow (D) and Doug Lamborn (R) goals to counter OMB’s case by establishing space units in just seven states and Guam.
That’s all that’s needed to be certain that roughly 1,000 Air National Guard members who support the Space Force can proceed to achieve this without major disruption, Lamborn told .
The bill named the Space National Guard Establishment Act is “our try to get across the argument that it has a giant price tag,” Lamborn said. “We don’t think that’s true. So that is an try to prove that.”
The case against a Space National Guard was bolstered by a 2020 report from the Congressional Budget Office that estimated it might cost anywhere from $100 million to $900 million, assuming every U.S. state and territory established their very own space guard units. Those estimates also factored latest buildings and a big growth in staff on the National Guard Bureau.
Guard proponents insist that’s an unfair and inaccurate cost estimate based on false assumptions. They note that outside of the seven states — Colorado, California, Hawaii, Alaska, Recent York, Ohio, Florida — and Guam, there aren’t any plans to expand in some other state, and that will require separate authorization from Congress anyway. In addition they indicate that the Guard has not asked for any latest buildings.
A separate Space National Guard Establishment Act proposed by Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) was introduced in February.
This may be the senators’ third try to pass an area guard bill, and Colorado lawmakers’ second consecutive effort.
In comparison with a 12 months ago, said Lamborn, “I feel more persons are coming around to the necessity for a Space National Guard, especially if we adopt our proposed laws that concentrates on only eight states. So it’s not a national transition for everybody at the identical time.”
![](https://i0.wp.com/spacenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-04-27-at-1.17.33-PM.png?resize=780%2C387&ssl=1)
The Crow-Lamborn bill is predicted to be included within the House version of the National Defense Authorization Act. The fate of the Feinstein-Rubio bill is more uncertain because the Senate has not supported it in years past.
“Saying that the fee is prohibitive isn’t any longer a robust argument now that we’ve narrowed it down,” said Lamborn.
Space Force staying neutral
The political fight over the space guard has put the U.S. Space Force in a troublesome spot. After the Space Force was established in December 2019, Congress asked the Department of the Air Force for a advice on how you can organize its reserve components.
The Department of the Air Force drafted a report in March 2021 that beneficial establishing a Space National Guard “with minimal or no latest cost” and transferring the units performing space duties under the Air National Guard. That report was never formally submitted to Congress as a consequence of OMB’s opposition, in line with several congressional sources who spoke with .
Over the past two years, former Chief of Space Operations Gen. John Raymond and Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall argued for alternative approaches, similar to consolidating energetic duty and reserve components and allowing some members to work part-time. But they didn’t propose establishing a Space National Guard.
The present Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Probability Saltzman has only spoken in broad terms about this issue, highlighting the importance of the talents that those Guard units possess.
In response to questions on Saltzman’s position, a spokesperson told that the Department of the Air Force is “still evaluating the perfect future disposition of current Air National Guard space units. General Saltzman all the time emphasizes that the capabilities which might be within the Guard are critical, and we want to search out a strategy to maintain them.”
Guard units in limbo
Col. Michael Bruno, chief of staff for the Colorado National Guard Joint Staff, told that the uncertainty concerning the way forward for the Air National Guard’s space units has hurt morale and undermined recruiting.
“This must be solved,” he said. “There’s going to be a breaking point coming up ultimately. Things can’t proceed down this path.”
When the Space Force was established, energetic duty space units were moved out of the Air Force and placed within the Space Force, but no corresponding move was made to create a Space Force National Guard component.
Bruno explained that the roughly 1,000 members of the Air National Guard who perform space operations duties — similar to controlling communications and missile warning satellites, and electronic warfare systems — are actually “orphans” as they’re technically under the Air Force however the Air Force isn’t any longer accountable for space missions.
The Space Force is now constructing its own culture, it has its own basic training and personnel regulations, Bruno noted. “But our folks are orphaned. They’re supporting space missions but they still fall under the Air National Guard.”
If Congress doesn’t establish a Space National Guard, the probable end result is that the Air Force will stop funding these units because they aren’t aligned with the air service.
Moving the Air National Guard’s space professionals to a Space National Guard would correct that misalignment, Bruno said.
CBO cost estimate ‘misinformed’
Guard officials have estimated that reassigning the space units from the Air National Guard to the Space National Guard would cost not more than $250,000, said Bruno.
“CBO was at best misinformed,” he said.
The one expenses can be to make name tapes for the uniforms, change signs at bases and make unit patches, said Bruno. “It could literally be done on a drill weekend.”
There may be one other issue that no one is talking about, he said, which is the potential cost and time it might take to coach latest people to perform the duties performed today by guardsmen if their units are deactivated.
“If we take the missions out of the guard, there may be a capability gap,” Bruno said.
The Air National Guard, for instance, has 60% of the deployable space electromagnetic warfare units that support U.S. combatant commands world wide, said Bruno. “They’re continually deployed.”
“If that goes away, rebuilding that squadron of 80 people to the identical skill and knowledge levels would take seven to 10 years,” he said.
It’s necessary to keep in mind that Guard units have a federal mission but in addition support their states, he said. If the space units aren’t moved to the Space National Guard, the Air Force likely will convert those jobs to air-focused positions. And it’s doubtful, Bruno added, that many members will hand over their status under the Air National Guard to hitch the Space Force as an active-duty member.
“The beauty of the guard is we’re trained, organized and equipped to fight our nation’s war as reserves to our energetic duty counterparts,” Bruno noted. “But we also work in our communities to reply to crises like natural disasters, search and rescue and health emergencies just like the covid pandemic.”
Bruno said the clock is ticking. “The unknown factor is creeping into the morale and psyche of our members.”