You heard me! It’s time for a truck driver — or anyone within the trades — to assist direct how artificial intelligence is implemented. There’s no higher place to do this than as a board member of OpenAI, a very powerful organization within the AI world and, probably, the world period.
AI famously has the potential to alter or destroy all the pieces about human existence. To tackle this massive responsibility, OpenAI was founded in 2015 to be a nonprofit. In 2019, it restructured to even have a for-profit arm that accepts investors. The nonprofit board of directors essentially controls that for-profit organization, they usually don’t have any equity in the corporate. And, investors into OpenAI are capped at 100 times their initial investment.
These safeguards existed so OpenAI could ensure “artificial general intelligence advantages all of humanity,” reasonably than a select group of profiteers. Nevertheless, as some writers have dourly recorded previously week, it seems that OpenAI is popping away from this lofty goal.
The recent leadership fracas revealed this shake-up. OpenAI’s board fired CEO Sam Altman on Nov. 17. Reportedly, the board believed Altman’s thirst for expanding AI put the organization’s safety mission in danger. Altman was rehired five days later. Now, OpenAI has wiped the teachers from its board (who supported firing Altman) and replaced them with corporate bigwigs (who clearly want Altman around).
I’m delighted to see the previous Treasury secretary and the previous co-CEO of Salesforce have found places on the OpenAI board. But, amid this reorganization, let’s not forget so as to add people whose livelihoods are most vulnerable to vanishing within the case of an AI revolution.
Autonomous truck driving, even in its early stages, will massively change the roles of two.2 million people. Depriving all truck drivers of their livelihood — or gutting the job to the purpose of undesirability, as is more likely within the short term — would decimate the financial stability of an enormous chunk of the American populace.
There’s absolute confidence this technology is coming. The query is how exactly it should be deployed. For that reason, I’d suggest — with a healthy dose of bias, as someone who reported on the trucking industry for the past six years — it’s time for a truck driver to affix the OpenAI board.
Truck drivers are already the petri dish for a way all of us work
It might look like the concerns of a truck driver wouldn’t be applicable to the larger labor economy. But, in some cases, truck drivers are the petri dish for the longer term of labor. What truck drivers are experiencing today often becomes the norm for all staff within the a long time to follow.
One pertinent example is the digital monitoring of staff. These topics have only just change into relevant for office staff, particularly those that work remotely, but surveillance of this variety has been common or federally mandated for drivers for years. Like distant staff, truck drivers have a manager who isn’t right over their shoulder; other tools have developed within the boss’s absence.
“[T]ruckers could also be canaries within the coal mine: investigating digital surveillance and rule enforcement on this industry can provide us vital clues about how these dynamics may function in other contexts, each inside and out of doors the workplace,” Cornell assistant professor Karen Levy wrote in her recent book on trucking surveillance, “Data Driven.”
![](https://www.freightwaves.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/29/image-1.jpeg)
Because the early 2010s, it’s been common for an enormous rig to feature cameras facing into and out of the cab, tablets that alert drivers who brake too hard, and a unit that collects hundreds of information points a minute for back offices to research.
In 2018, the federal government began mandated ELDs within the cabs of all trucks. This law was designed to implement hours-of-service laws on truck drivers and stop fatigue-caused crashes. A federal study estimated that the ELD rule would prevent 1,844 crashes and 26 deaths annually.
Nevertheless, government data has not proved out any safety gains consequently of the mandate. That’s arguably since the ELD mandate was more of a band-aid than an answer. The explanation truck drivers are fatigued likely has to do with the structure of their day. Truckers are typically paid per mile, in order that they’re incentivized to drive as many miles as they will. Constraining the variety of hours that they will do that has led to more reckless driving, as one 2019 study showed.
“Technology often fails as an answer because the issues it’s intended to resolve aren’t, at their core, technology problems — they’re social, economic, and cultural problems, they usually require solutions in the identical register,” Levy wrote. “Trying to deal with these problems via technology often means insufficiently accounting for the world because it is.”
Through this early exposure to government-mandated tracking, the trucking industry has learned that technology alone can’t be the tool to repair issues in an industry. It needs to be matched with larger, more systemic changes. It is a perspective that will be useful for the OpenAI board.
We’re not eliminating drivers anytime soon, however the job might be slowly degraded
The trucking industry deserves representation on the OpenAI board, too, due to monumental change autonomous driving would bring to the industry. (For starters, there’s an estimated annual savings of $300 billion in labor costs.)
![](https://www.freightwaves.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/29/image.jpeg)
In fact, not all 2.2 million truck driver jobs are going away anytime soon, nor would they vanish unexpectedly. Fully driverless semi-trucks are actually a long time away.
Before that, we’ll see the proliferation of partially automated trucks. These vehicles will speed, brake and steer on their very own, though a driver’s hands could be required on the wheel in any respect times.
A recent study led by Stephen V. Burks of the University of Minnesota Morris suggests even this minor incursion of autonomous technology would likely push drivers out of the industry. In keeping with that evaluation, increasing autonomous driving technology would drive down pay and drive up “dispatch intensity.” More newbies would enter the industry. It’s unclear if the potential safety gains from partially automated trucks would offset the lack of protected, experienced drivers.
In a further-off future, truck driving might be a combination of city driving and highway driving. Mostly autonomous trucks would steer freight in highway settings, then have the truck driver take over within the more unpredictable city driving.
As Levy wrote, this may threaten truck drivers’ pay, even when the driving force continues to be firmly within the cabin. Truck drivers are, as noted, paid per mile. It’s unclear why or whether firms would pay them during long stretches of highway if a robot is already doing the job. In fact, that’s the vast majority of miles a long-haul driver runs anyway.
People enjoy doing things
There’s something harder to capture in data or studies that will change with trucking because the art of driving is worn away. Truck drivers driving on long stretches of empty highway, in the identical way that I writing. Technologists might consider driving as a hassle and seek ways to eliminate it, but, to a trucker, such an aim is sacrilege.
“Though driving is technically a privilege granted by the state, it’s assumed and understood by most to be a God-given right,” truck driver Gord Magill recently wrote for Compact magazine. “Learning to drive, for a long time one in every of the signal marks of maturity, is slowly being taken away or forgotten. There are costs to this loss.”
Programmer James Somers put it one other way. In a recent Recent Yorker article, he considered legendary Go player Lee Sedol, who retired early after a pc program famously trounced Lee in a series of Go matches. Somers, just like the truck driver Magill, also senses that his own craft is vanishing.
“Perhaps what pushed Lee Sedol to retire from the sport of Go was the sense that the sport had been perpetually cheapened,” Somers wrote. “Once I got into programming, it was because computers felt like a type of magic … . Then, in the future, it became possible to realize lots of the same ends without the considering and without the knowledge. Checked out in a certain light, this may make quite a whole lot of one’s working life look like a waste of time.”
Let’s hear from normal people
AI will likely change all the pieces about our world. A healthy chunk of the population would probably prefer that this not occur. And, in trucking, we are able to find tens of millions of people that deserve some form of voice in how this technology unfolds.
People like OpenAI board members Larry Summers, the previous Treasury secretary, and Bret Taylor, the previous co-CEO of Salesforce, will not be going to be slammed by AI. Neither will former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who was reportedly considered for the board. Unlike the remaining of us, they don’t need a biweekly paycheck to place food on the table or a roof over their heads.
As a substitute, elevating the voices of individuals whose lives may very well be significantly gutted by AI is crucial. Truck drivers, who often is the first mass defenestration of the AI era, are a critical population to incorporate.
The post Commentary: Let’s get a truck driver on the OpenAI board appeared first on FreightWaves.